I find myself continuing to contemplate yesterday's discussion
concerning naming and identity. One of your peers, Dani, mentioned concerns
about the exclusivity of naming as community members who are 'Othered' attempt
to influence the image of themselves. The example of the BET network got me
thinking about how naming of the Self (when struggling through oppression)
influences our interactions with others considered dominant within certain
social structures. For example, for a long time I've seen friends (male as well
as people of color) feel in excluded from feminist conversations due to
perceptions of the term 'feminism'. The 'femin' root may seem exclusive to
women and the history of the movement and organizations with that name have
been predominantly and sometimes exclusively white (Brown, 1989; Chehade, 2001).
When we name or identify or classify, we not only create 'in'
groups, but also 'out' groups (Bowker and Stars, 1999; Burke, 1941). When
people specifically communicate instances of oppression through how they name
their identity, "a lack of white privilege can be experienced as
oppression" (Nakamura, 2002, p. 78).
Here is a question that I have come to to (hopefully) further our
dialogue: If though our identity reclamation others recognize their
privilege/experience oppression, how might that recognition influence
dialogue?
I am not advocating for the invisibility of oppression or
silencing identity reclamation (as Burke noted we cannot legislate
language)-racial invisibility allows for a privileged group to “take their
identity as the norm or stand by which other groups are measured” (Martin,
Krizek, Nakayama, & Bradford, 1996) and facilitate privilege through
silence. I am just wondering how the labels we choose influence the potential
for dialogue.
refs:
Brown, E. B. (1989). Womanist Consciousness: Maggie Lena Walker and the Independent Order of Saint Luke. Signs, 14(3), 610-633.
Bowker,
G.C., & Stars, S.L. (1999) Sorting things out classification and
its consequences. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Burke, K.
(1941). The philosophy of literary form (3rd ed.). Berkeley,
CA: University of California Press.
Chehade C (2001) Big little white lies: Our attempt to
white-out America. New Brunswick, NJ: Nehmarche
Publishing.
Martin, J. N., Krizek, R. L., Nakayama, T. K., & Bradford, L.
(1996). Exploring Whiteness: A study of self labels for white Americans. Communication
Quarterly, 44(2): pp. 125-144.
Nakamura, L. (2002). Head-hunting on the internet: Identity
tourism, avatars, and racial passing in the textual and graphic chat spaces. In
L. Nakamura (Ed.), Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the
Internet (pp. 31-60). New York: Routledge.
providing a response to this post will count toward as a response post.
No comments:
Post a Comment