A Bit of Chapter 1 & A Bit of Chapter 2

So far what I think about Communication Ethics, and I mean so far, is how it subjective it really is. Like most people have already mentioned, this is a tough one. To be able to communicate your own definition of good or bad to someone who sees differently never really is that easy, let alone trying to get them to agree. I think, key word 'think', that if we were to sit down with someone and have a conversation with them we would not leave the conversation astonished because in reality if you actually pay attention and actually participate in the conversation, you will learn something new. Leaving a conversation with new information is one thing, but within the conversation you are learning as well. The beginning may be a little shaky but as time passes and intentional listening and nonverbal cues are casually volley-balled back and forth, I'd say it doesn't necessarily take a whole conversation to at least get to know the person, it's a process. 

As for defining Ethics in Communication, it is also a process. There is no one way of defining it for everyone in general. It goes down to specifics. People's individual stories. Some peoples' stories mix quite well like Romantic-Comedy or an Action/Sci-fi movies (to the general public) while other seem to be a little misplaced, out of touch and incoherent (quite possibly like what I am saying/typing) such as Horror-Comedy or Drama-Adventure movies. Stand a lone they may be pretty darn good, but when mixed you may scratch your head a bit and ask yourself "Why are they making a sequel?" To that question I will answer, some people like those kinds of mixings of the stories. It works for them, they may not get nominated for oscars or be considered great movies but they could be cult classics. Honestly, that was attempt as to get a metaphor out of what I read. I tend to be a vomit writer, but as these blogs go on I will do my best to make them more structured. Because, you know, it's a process.