Because we live in an era of disagreement, public discourse has become something of a bloody battleground. With so many definitions of "good" or right versus wrong, almost everyone feels the need to voice their opinion and their beliefs. While there is certainly nothing wrong with this need (indeed, everyone is entitled to their own opinion), the idea of public discourse ethics has fallen through the gaping cracks of difference. Since difference is the energy that drives communication and dialogue, then dialogic ethics are key in the realm of public discourse.
We have to listen to be able to learn. How can you possibly hear what there is to be said when you refuse to listen or don't acknowledge the voices of others? Listen without demand. Take into consideration this specific and particular moment of time, this context. This moment is unlike any other in all the world, so it won't progress the same way nor will it be addressed or potentially solved in the same way. Beyond listening, we have to be actively attentive. How are you, individually, being influenced or influencing this particular situation? The other person in the conversation? You have to negotiate the moment. There are emergent answers to be found, but we must acknowledge that not all questions or debates have immediate answers. We have to be satisfied with the success of simple ethical public discourse. Listen and learn.
No comments:
Post a Comment